Blog & photo gallery

請進 Discuz! Board

27-12-2011

獅尾,雞胸

(best-view 1280x1024)

 

冬季季候風持續影響華南。本港地區今晚及明日天氣預測晚間部分時間多雲,天氣清涼,最低氣溫約16度。明日大致天晴,最高氣溫約20度。吹和緩偏東風。展望:本週後期部分時間有陽光,早上天氣清涼。

page 2 page 3 page 4



全程用 Nikon D80 + Nikon 18-55mm VR + Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 主力拍片  (註: 相片EXIF內附 GPS位置 數據) + SQR-2100   or ; 如慾了解 更多 相裡面 GPS的 換算, 請到 GPS 有唔少朋友問我GPS點玩, 我摸盲雞 後有一些 攻略 經驗, 有興趣望下, 無謂浪費我一擔心機 去片 .

開始 - 大休

大休 - 博康  

 
(   由於相片已 post 過久時間, 大部原相已刪除, 只留index作記錄回味. 唯保留以下數張作行程重點recall

 


我本身有 18-200. 原本想買枝 18-105. 最後昨晚出旺角 買了 枝 18-55VR 穌寧賣 $950, 完全 抵買到爛. 

Ken 有段引言.

The plastic-mount 18-105mm VR is a decent enough general-purpose lens for people who are in the price range of the D90 with which it is kitted, but for $400 ($300 in a kit with the D90), I'd rather buy something else.

The photos are nice and sharp most of the time, but if you're looking closely, the 18-105mm is Nikon's fuzziest lens in the corners at 18mm. Even the $100 18-55mm is better.

For $400, you could buy either of the excellent 18-55mm kit lenses which are sharper at 18mm (VR or non-VR, your choice), and with the money left over, buy the professional 50mm f/1.4 AF-D or 50mm f/1.8 AF-D for use in low light, all for the same price or less than the 18-105mm.

For not much more, I could get the superior metal-mount 16-85mm VR or 18-200mm VR instead, either of which is also superior to the 18-105mm.

The only DX midrange zoom I like less than this 18-105mm is the non-VR 18-135mm, which is also overpriced.

睇埋下面尼段, 我又幾同意佢嘅講法.

I'd pass on this 18-105mm lens (豐澤 $2680). It's too expensive for what you get. $400 for a plastic mount lens? Not from my wallet, but if you want a light, do-almost everything lens for a DX camera and don't mind the price, this could be your ticket.

I would forget the 18-135mm since it lacks VR.

Personally I love the more expensive 18-200mm VR because it does just about everything. For only about $250 more ($650 total), the 18-200mm VR could be the only lens you ever need. (後因影得多 我才明白 和 認同.)

I prefer both the 18-55mm and 18-55mm VR lenses, which are both sharper and a fraction of the price! I use them when I go on vacation and want light weight (正是我想買的原因). In all honesty, I don't like long lenses. The best photos come from getting close enough, not from throwing more money into a longer lens to shoot from farther away. You can make great portraits with these 18-55 lenses, and geesh, how many head shots do you need anyway? I usually shoot my people pictures at shorter zoom settings than 55mm anyway.

If you insist on soft backgrounds for portraits, none of these zooms does a particularly spectacular job. (我另外有枝 85 F1.4 , 尼枝係要必買, 再貴都無必要, 因為 佢 真係 好完美. 我畀十個推薦) If you're doing posed portraits, you could use an old manual focus 135mm f/2.8 (about $150 used) or 80-200mm f/2.8 ($900 new) for far better results. See Portrait Lenses for more ideas.

Don't forget the 50mm f/1.8 AF-D and 50mm f/1.4 AF-D, each pro lenses and each much less expensive than this zoom. Each will autofocus on every camera except the D40, D40x and D60, for which you would need the new 50mm AF-S instead.


今日因為係假期, 特別多人.

起步無耐, 我地係 黃大仙 商場 兜嚟兜去.

叫行多次 都唔記得.

今日 大清, 財哥, amy, 穌兒 都有嚟.

a1


a2

a3

由澗 左上 石馬.


page 2 page 3 page 4


 Email me

Last update 2012/05/09

Web Server supported by AppServ Version 2.5.10 for Windows 2003 server. Web page edited by FrontPage2003 and or Dreamweaver CS3. Slide Photo by Johannes Knabe . Video edited by Adobe Premiere Pro.